The Struggle Continues: On Focusing POWERFUL Loving Rage, Sex, and Targeting Points of Rupture

This post is going to be a little different than all the rest. I’m writing this post as I am thinking about a paper I am currently working on. I would like any constructive feedback, even if it’s a simple ‘like’ as that ‘like’ is not as simple to me as it seems. Ready? 

My Thought Stream:

I’m contemplating even trying anymore following my class discussion earlier. I mean, my intellectual space has been relegated to me by the discipline I am busting my ass to make myself intelligible to. Sometimes it’s easy to quiet the noise of my mind and inclination screaming at me about the disperate power relations at play within this field. I think to myself, ‘I guess as long as our social structure remains unchanged, disperate power dynamics will ALWAYS be at play in any intellectual discipline that I locate myself, as long as I am me,’ which usually reinvigorates my place of rage at least enough to focus on the particular philosophical projects at hand, because, well, what can I do otherwise? Give up? 

~And Then Class Happened~

We were talking about all things social/structural power dynamics within the discipline of philosophy. There was a suggestion in one of the papers we discussed of developing a culture of praxis in attempt to get away from the traditional/normative culture of justification. Basically what I understood from this proposition is that by focusing on how your philosophical project contributes to a bigger issue/theme, the validation is your contribution to the bigger theme. Any incongruence with normativity would be seen as places of new thought and potential. This culture of praxis would attempt to foster an open, more inclusive atmosphere, allowing a flow of multiple canons (foundational/guiding rhetoric), which could potentially rupture the majorly discriminatory norm of justification currently practiced within the discipline. With that said, the culture of justification I am referring to is one that can most simply be defined by the following question, “How is your project [doing/an exemplar of] philosophy?” This statement has very negative and systematically violent connotations when you consider the power dynamics at work in the process of explaining how your philosophical project is congruent with the normative canonical discourse, within a discipline that does NOT prioritize your subfield at any level of importance higher than ancillary, while simultaneously dismissing your intellectual capacity, all of which can be distinguished as ramifications of implicit racist, sexist, and elitist (to name only a few) biases that were learned and reified through socialization. The proposition of fostering a culture of praxis gets a lot more specific, but for the sake of this post a basic framework will work. My biggest question hinges on the issue of whether it really would DO anything to actually rupture the hegemonic culture of justification, or would it, like most other dissenting opinions, be relegated to the margins with the rest of us? 

Long story short, I’m in a pretty hapless headspace while attempting to compose the paper I am currently working on. I’m sad about this because I think this paper has potential to be pretty stellar. 

What Paper You Ask?

As I do not want to go into the details of my work in progress, I am going to be (probably too) vague. I’m working on a paper that focuses on the murkiness that is the gap between scholarly rhetoric/discourse & praxis surrounding Black Female sexual identity politics. So, things and themes that come to mind include (but most certainly is not limited to):

Philosophers/Writers/Scholars/Activists:

Patricia Hill Collins

Jennifer Nash

Sharon P. Holland 

bell hooks

Melissa Harris-Perry

Erykah Badu

Janelle Monae

To name a few on my list…

Themes/Issues:

Sex

Porn

Power

Knowledge

Accessibility

Performativity

Resilience

Double Consciousness

Implicit Bias

Violence

Love

and all the tensions in between to name a few thangs.

I want to format the content of this paper in a fairly unique and engaging way, but with my head space being all up in the noise of the systematic disperate power dynamic within the discipline, I am stuck in a seemingly infinite loop of considering my efforts futile BEFORE. THEY. EVEN. HAPPEN.

This is one of those times where focusing rage is important, I presume. But the point of this post was not to give myself a pre paper pep talk (alliteration FTW). I wrote this in reaction to the internal struggle I face constantly because of what I chose to dedicate my life’s work to (or rather what chose me). I want to write this (almost) immediately following my visceral reaction so that it was fresh and raw for you to consume and ingest. 

To ALL my marginalized comrades in whatever facet(s) you experience it, HOW DO YOU FACE/CONFRONT IT in such a way that doesn’t make you feel complicit to the system that subjugates you? How can you stay afloat with all of the futility built in the position you are so compelled to dedicate yourself to? At what point does the individual process of creating your own tools to dismantle the insidious power dynamic inscribing the framework of whatever institutional/systematic/structual situation you’re in, shift into a divisive series of unintelligible micro-aggressions that end up doing not much more (if it does anything at all) than re-centering the hegemony that subjugates MANY more than it benefits? No, I’m not saying to negate ALL of the individual uniqueness within the plenitude of lived marginalizations and create a universal rhetoric of ‘the marginal’ to ‘hegemony’ (that is a false dichotomy, AND a potentially harmful method for a variety of reasons I am not going to go into at this point). I am however saying that I find there does need to be more of a collectively focused method & target to aim our individually formed tools of rupture. The majority of us all make collective noise/agressive action in the face of extreme and obviously explicit cases of violence and denigration, yet we seem divisive (in this case to the point of our own demise) in the face of the insidious structural power dynamic this nation was founded on. 

Again, this is ANOTHER one of those instances when focusing rage is CRITICAL. Not only do we need our uniquely formed tools, but we need a collective focused method of rupture to accompany them. Let’s MAKE our multiplicitous voices of dissension be heard! YOUR STRUGGLE IS NOT FUTILE.

Now, let me feel your focused rage and feed on it. Let me absorb the power in it to sustain me through all my research & writing. Let me HEAR YOUR VOICE and KNOW that all my struggle is not futile. 

Talk about this with your friends if you’re so inclined, share this. Remember, the root of the rage I am constantly trying to stimulate is LOVE. The more people thinking about this, the more potential to lovingly rupture the social/structural framework founded on insidiously disperate power dynamics. Let’s lovingly rupture violent normative power. It starts with you.

I am hopeful in the thought of and am also looking forward to reading all of your replies to my post sharing your experience of focused loving rage, potential targets of rupture, even to see that you support this struggle I’m facing (though I most assuredly am not claiming to be alone in the struggle I’m writing about here) by ‘liking’ this post. I need you right now.

Image

Until Next Time, Comrades,

-D

Advertisements

About thepsych1

I am a natural progression. As I learn and grow, so does this blog as a reflection of myself. Poetry Art Videos Critique Let's collaborate. Bring your friends.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Struggle Continues: On Focusing POWERFUL Loving Rage, Sex, and Targeting Points of Rupture

  1. I’m not sure why, but some of the way that you’re describing hegemony here reminds me of bullying…

    ” HOW DO YOU FACE/CONFRONT IT in such a way that doesn’t make you feel complicit to the system that subjugates you? How can you stay afloat with all of the futility built in the position you are so compelled to dedicate yourself to? At what point does the individual process of creating your own tools to dismantle the insidious power dynamic inscribing the framework of whatever institutional/systematic/structual situation you’re in, shift into a divisive series of unintelligible micro-aggressions that end up doing not much more (if it does anything at all) than re-centering the hegemony that subjugates MANY more than it benefits?”

    I wonder if there are other parallels that would help to explain/deal with/defuse hegemony the way bullying can be defused.

    • thepsych1 says:

      Thank you SO MUCH for your reply to this post, it gives me LIFE. I also think you raise a really good point. I am going to think more about this, but here are my initial thoughts. I’m thinking about the implicit, unspoken complicity to this structural power. So if we were to compare it to bullying, how could we make a solid enough connection between the implicit disparate institutional/systematic/structural power dynamics among those of us within the margin in relation to the normative power discussed, to the role of the bully victims? I vaguely recall a commercial out that attempted to provide a more empowering perspective of kids that fit the social schema of quintessential bully victims and came up with the slogan, “The geeks will inherit the earth.” That to me, was more insidious than the bully relationship the commercial was attempting to thwart. They basically were like, ‘okay, pick on me all you want, when I get older I’ll get my revenge on you because I’ll be your boss.’ So, I guess I see that specific example of the bully victim relationship to be closest to what I am referring to in my original post, as I don’t think they speak explicitly about the bullies or specific bullying they are confronted with as victims, they are basically sticking to empowering language about their own likes and academic interests. However, I definitely don’t see that method of rupture to be beneficial for anyone but those complying (either tacitly or otherwise) to normative structural power though, all I see it doing is re-centering the values that inscribe the current structural power dynamic. But that is just the first example that came to mind after reading your reply! Thanks again 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s