This week we read a few chapters of Nancy Fraser’s Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. In the MOST general terms, what these chapters discussed was the shift from classical capitalist liberalism to a neoliberal agenda. To be a little more specific, Fraser discusses how this new-capitalistic frame uses the aims of second-wave feminism as a handmaiden to usher in the ideals and motivations to perpetuate the neoliberal agenda, which bolsters the same power dynamic of exclusion and discriminations (E.g., Racism, Sexism, Classism, Elitism, and Ableism to name a few) that traditional/classical liberalism founded (just in a new, more insidious way!). Fraser then moves to incite action to a new/revitalized feminist project. Generally, I was not very connected to this reading. I didn’t think that Fraser was writing to me, I thought this must have been directed to some elite class of people with autonomy and worth relative to the disparate power dynamic within our current social/political/economic frame. Even the use of the term race within the reading seemed uncomfortable to me. I suppose I will take this and turn it into a few questions that will hopefully generate some class discussion… I am going to need it, as I am leading discussion next week in which we are reading responses to some of things read this week! Here we go:
Chapter 8: Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World
– I thought of this chapter as the set up. Here’s where I will base my response:
“Addressing not only ordinary-political misrepresentation, but also misframing and meta-political misrepresentation, it allows us to grasp the problem of the frame as a matter of justice. Focused not only on the “what” of justice, but also on the “who” and the “how,” it enables us to evaluate the justice of alternative principles and alternative processes of frame-setting.” (Fraser, 208)
1. Why is the framing aspect so important? Why do we worry about that in a fundamentally flawed, volatile social system, founded in power disparities, that has always worked in service to White heteropatriarchy? I mean, arguably, there are real reasons to call that out, but what is it really doing? If the neoliberal agenda is perpetuating the same basic power dynamic (except more insidiously), isn’t focus on the ‘who’ and ‘how’ a tool for the neoliberal shift to use to perpetuate their power dynamic? It seems like a re-centering of power.
Chapter 9: Feminism, Capitalism, and the Cunning of History
-Here’s the meat n’ potatoes chapter. Here is where I base my response:
“It is often said that the movement’s relative success in transforming culture stands in sharp contrast with its relative failure to transform institutions.” (Fraser, 210)
1. I connected with this statement as I feel like I am living this even now (what does that SAY about me?!). We are working to transform our culture (politics, society, economic standing) but at the same time we silently comply to the restrictions/limitations/regulations/discriminations placed by the institutions we must work within in order to gain the credentials needed to make the moves we think we ought to. What is another way to do this? Why must we continue to perpetuate the SAME struggle? Isn’t that simply perpetuating our own demise? But what else is there to do? Violent revolution? ‘Peaceful’ protests? Why must we work within these systems of power to RUPTURE THEM?! Doesn’t that seem contradictory? I mean, no wonder there is such a sharp contrast as this.
Chapter 10: Between Marketization and Social Protection: Resolving the Feminist Ambivalence
-This is the “I figured it out!” section. Here’s where I based my response:
“The effect of introducing this missing third will be to transform the double movement into a triple movement, encompassing marketization, social protection, and emancipation.” (Fraser, 230)
1. Emancipation from domination through feminist critique? In our society? What type of feminist we talking here?
I hope to learn more about this reading tomorrow during our class discussion of it. I am frustrated and I hope for some clarity upon class. If I do find some clarity through our class discussion, I will be sure to update this post.